4 ms·
These questions were actually rhetorical. (I actually answered them, though in less detail) The thing is that I was kind of surprised by the length of the post
by Timothee 17y ago
These questions were actually rhetorical. (I actually answered them, though in less detail)
The thing is that I was kind of surprised by the length of the post compared to the relative lack of insight. Usually John Gruber brings interesting points and reflection to his posts, going in depth on a lot of his arguments; but with "Why 960x640" as a title, I was hoping to read something I didn't know or didn't think about. Here he mostly stated facts without, in my opinion, really answering the question "why does an iPhone need a higher resolution/pixel density?".
- cwp 17y agoWell, there's this: "The next-gen iPhone is shooting for that caliber of resolution — not merely to exceed the resolution of competing devices, but to rival the optical quality of print." He doesn't belabour it, because it's obvious: high quality text is really pleasant to look at, and that will sell more iPhones.