3 ms·
Bit of a fallacy there don't you think? I imagine it touches on a great deal of topics that can be googled for more accurate information, right? I just glance
by toolz 10y ago
Bit of a fallacy there don't you think? I imagine it touches on a great deal of topics that can be googled for more accurate information, right? I just glanced over it and noticed the attention to detail, so while given the source it's probably not a great idea to follow the conclusions it draws blindly, it's likely still a great resource for keywords, no?
- pjc50 10y agoThat's like saying that the virus-laden phishing PDF you just recieved might contain useful information. You shouldn't go anywhere near it. If there's real substance to the allegations, there will be another copy somewhere more respectable.
- toolz 10y agoAre you suggesting a reddit post could irreversibly damage someone if they read it? That's a bit extreme is it not? I was able to glance through and glean plenty of keywords that lead to me being able to search for reputable sources that before hand I wouldn't have known what to search for. Now I'm just hoping I didn't contract a virus somehow xD
- edmccard 10y ago>it touches on a great deal of topics ... it's likely still a great resource for keywords, no? What? No. When a source is that biased, then the "list of topics covered" (and the keywords associated with them) do not somehow magically escape that bias; it is not a "great resource" for anything except the viewpoints of r/MensRights