3 ms·
By the way, has anybody seen the rationalwiki page for Reddit? Some of it's accurate, and some of it is hilariously wrong: For example, they claimed the now inf
by qwertyuiop924 10y ago
By the way, has anybody seen the rationalwiki page for Reddit? Some of it's accurate, and some of it is hilariously wrong: For example, they claimed the now infamous "Reddit Revolt" was due to /r/FPH being banned, which just goes to show how utterly out of touch they are.
- makomk 10y agoRationalWiki are part of the same social justice crowd as SRS, so that's not entirely surprising.
- qwertyuiop924 10y agoReally? They seem to hate SRS just as much as we do...
- ZeroGravitas 10y agoI'm a bit confused that I just responded to another post of yours in this same discussion that seemed to indicate you didn't know what SRS was?
- qwertyuiop924 10y agoI read up on it. And I also read RationalWiki claiming that they hate SRS, which is enough information for this post.
- davidgerard 10y agoThis is literally false. Source: seven-year RationalWiki editor, RMF board member.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- iza 10y agoRationalWiki is almost as bad as Conservapedia. It's fine for debunking religion and pseudoscience but anything else is extremely biased.
- qwertyuiop924 10y agoI mean, I expected that, but this isn't just biased, it's actually wrong. As in, it directly contradicts reality, and anybody who had done five minutes of research would know the real story.