3 ms·
I'm pretty sure it's not HN's job to work around WSJ's decision to require an account to view their articles. Why don't people just stop submitting WSJ article
by ninkendo 10y ago
I'm pretty sure it's not HN's job to work around WSJ's decision to require an account to view their articles.
Why don't people just stop submitting WSJ articles?
- irishcoffee 10y ago> Why don't people just stop submitting WSJ articles? Ehrm, huh? That is your proposed solution? Just a SWAG: The articles are interesting. This claim can be backed up by the fact that WSJ articles show up on the front page fairly frequently.
- ninkendo 10y agoI'm not sure what SWAG means but WSJ clearly doesn't want news aggregator visitors to view their articles for free. So the complaints should be directed at the WSJ, not the news aggregator. I don't have a solution I'm just saying it's WSJ's fault here, not HN.