4 ms·
I used to more or less alternate between Github and Bitbucket but I've been using GitLab exclusively for the past six months. So far it's been a mostly painles
by LurkerAbove 10y ago
I used to more or less alternate between Github and Bitbucket but I've been using GitLab exclusively for the past six months. So far it's been a mostly painless transition. I've only had one hiccup, I had an IP banned for an hour or so but that's more Netbeans' fault than GitLab's .
- hellofunk 10y agoI've read reports that GL is quite slow. Just browsing their site or existing issues pages causes long load times. Has that been an issue for you?
- jobvandervoort 10y agoGitLab itself is pretty fast if you host it yourself. Pretty much independent of scale. GitLab.com, our hosted instance that you're asking about, is slow. Sometimes painfully so. There are several reasons for that, but as an end-user that won't relieve the pain. We are working on it, hard. You can get an idea of that here [0]. As you can see, we've made significant improvements over the past months, but are now facing some setbacks with our hosting provider. At GitLab Inc, we use GitLab.com exclusively for all our development. We have all the reason in the world to make sure it runs really really fast and stable. I'd encourage you to give it a try and otherwise consider running your own instance. It only takes about 2 minutes to set one up, less so if you use pre-build versions like our Docker containers or various cloud-platform images [1]. [0]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/infrastructure/issues/59 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/infrastructure/issues/59 [1]: https://about.gitlab.com/downloads/ https://about.gitlab.com/downloads/
- hellofunk 10y agoI appreciate your candor.
- LurkerAbove 10y agoPage loads on GL.com can take a while, but I wouldn't say that I've found the actual pull/push cycle to be slow per se. I'd describe it more like "measurable."