4 ms·
[citation needed]
by efdee 10y ago
[citation needed]
- jamnik 10y agoGoogle it!
- ionised 10y agoWe did, and nothing supports your claim.
- jamnik 10y agoOk, I googled it for you so no more excuses for supporting blood thirsty KGB: http://m.bild.de/politik/ausland/edward-snowden/kremlin-admits-snowden-is-a-russian-agent-46619846.bildMobile.html?wtmc=mw http://m.bild.de/politik/ausland/edward-snowden/kremlin-admi...
- kbart 10y agoHave you actually read the article yourself, or just the title? "he <E. Snowden> was never a “mole” for Moscow inside NSA. In reality, the Snowden Operation is probably a cover to deflect attention from the one or more actual Russian moles who have been lurking inside NSA for years, undetected."
- good_gnu 10y ago"Bild" is basically Germany's Fox News. The author has worked for the NSA in the past and seems to somehow glorify their unconstitutional mass surveillance crimes. The same guy has also claimed Snowden being able to speak German is somehow proof of KGB collaboration. Botice how the articles headline talks about "The Kremlin", when in reality this is one senator who has said something that could be construed as meaning that Snowden "brought intelligence". But there is a bigger overriding issue with your post. Somehow the KGB is "blood thirsty". Why do you think that? Have American intelligence agencies never killed people for political goal? Maybe it was just not disseminated in American news? Why do you not have an allegiance to values such as reason, humanitarianism or freedom as opposed to some flag?