I think we are saying the same thing. The court filing specifically noted "investigators seized thousands of pages of documents and dozens of computers and oth

I think we are saying the same thing. The court filing specifically noted "investigators seized thousands of pages of documents and dozens of computers and other digital storage devices and media containing, conservatively, fifty terabytes of information". It doesn't say whether that 50TB was all classified govt docs or just that they seized his personal computing equipment to investigate whether it contained any classified data. My point was that nowhere does it say 500M pages of documents; the press seems to have conflated the 50TB to mean approximately 500M pages (which sounds even bigger).