3 ms·
IANAL, but I'm pretty sure the answer to that is "yes". It would set a terrible precedent by authorising vigilantism, and I'm not sure how you would define "vul
by oneeyedpigeon 10y ago
IANAL, but I'm pretty sure the answer to that is "yes". It would set a terrible precedent by authorising vigilantism, and I'm not sure how you would define "vulnerable" under the law.