It's exactly a stereotype. AKA weak bayesian evidence for a characteristic based on other, easier to measure, characteristics. EDIT: I thought the result was g

It's exactly a stereotype. AKA weak bayesian evidence for a characteristic based on other, easier to measure, characteristics. EDIT: I thought the result was going to be exactly the opposite before I made this comment. My first impulse was to go and delete it. I'll leave figuring out implications of such biases in reasoning as an exercise to the reader :(