3 ms·
Seconded! I'd love to have some in really high res (I dunno what for, but I'd love to take a closer look). However, even medium res would be really cool, IMO th
by tripzilch 10y ago
Seconded! I'd love to have some in really high res (I dunno what for, but I'd love to take a closer look). However, even medium res would be really cool, IMO the generated pictures just a tad too low resolution to appreciate carefully.
Is it a compute/processing power thing? Does it take a lot more time to generate an image at say 5x resolution?
Also what I wondered about, quite a few of the images seem to have a sort of "canvas" like texture on them. Any idea why that is? Would a lot of the source images have canvas textures? Is it an artifact of the algorithm? It kinda feels like a highpass (edge enhance) filter as well. Or maybe they're just JPG artifacts?
- gabrielgoh 10y agothe artifacts are explained in detail here http://distill.pub/2016/deconv-checkerboard/ http://distill.pub/2016/deconv-checkerboard/ more compute will enable higher resolutions and less artifacts, but it means training a bigger GAN