5 ms·
>That might be what they say, but I think it's to compete with Google. That's not how ownership works. It's not "what they say". Either they own the company or
by marcoperaza 10y ago
>That might be what they say, but I think it's to compete with Google.
That's not how ownership works. It's not "what they say". Either they own the company or they don't...
- heartbreak 10y agoYeah isn't Time Warner Cable now merged with Charter to form what's now referred to simply as Spectrum?
- haalcion3 10y agoRead my response- I wasn't disputing ownership, nor was I disputing the Time Warner.
- haalcion3 10y agoI should have only quoted "AT&T just wants some content production companies" because the rest seems to have confused you. I wasn't disputing ownership.
- marcoperaza 10y agoPlease explain to me how competing with Google's broadband operation fits into all of this, then.
- googler1500 10y agoI think what they were trying to say is that AT&T is buying up Time Warner Cable/Spectrum to own more of the broadband and cellular service markets, such that they can better compete with Google, now offering broadband and Google Fi data service over Sprint and T-Mobile's cellular networks.
- marcoperaza 10y agoAT&T is NOT buying Time Warner Cable/Spectrum.
- jrockway 10y agoAT&T already has a wireline ISP, U-Verse. Google does not produce any TV channels, as far as I know. AT&T is buying Time Warner because Comcast bought NBC/Universal. I'm pretty sure it's as simple as that.