4 ms·
Trump said today, in a speech in Gettysburg, PA, that if he becomes president, he will work to block this transaction because it consolidates too much power.
by o0-0o 10y ago
Trump said today, in a speech in Gettysburg, PA, that if he becomes president, he will work to block this transaction because it consolidates too much power.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- jacquesm 10y agoYes, no conflict of interest there at all. He's right, but for the the wrong reasons and motivations.
- sb057 10y agoHow would a real estate investor have a conflict of interest in regards to a telecom merger? If you want to talk about a conflict of interest in presidential candidates, Hillary Clinton has received at least a combined $1,564,708 in political contributions from AT&T and Time Warner. Additionally, AT&T's senior executive Vice President James Cicconi has endorsed Clinton.
- jrockway 10y agoEveryone has endorsed Clinton.
- koolba 10y ago> Everyone has endorsed Clinton. Not everyone :D https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12728645 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12728645
- jacquesm 10y agoThis is not a telecom merger. Trump has many more businesses than just real-estate and his content competes with the content factory that AT&T wishes to procure (Time Warner, not time warner Cable the ISP). Though he's already had a run-in with TWC (not involved in this deal but I highly doubt that would matter much to Trump). http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/gossip/lat-hh16-donald-trump-time-warner-cable-photo.html http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/gossip/lat-hh16-donald-...
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- ErikVandeWater 10y agoI don't like it when Hacker News goes off on these political tangents, regardless of whether your comment was well-intentioned.
- pessimizer 10y agoThe comment is relevant to what is being discussed, and not a tangent - he is a candidate for the Presidency, which is an office that has influence on whether this deal will go through, and he did say that. Saying Trump is human garbage would be a tangent.
- daodedickinson 10y agoWe needed Teddy Roosevelt trust busting like that 7 years ago, preferably from someone without a lot of money in competitors of Time Warner (although Teddy wasn't the poorest chap).
- pessimizer 10y agoWe needed Bill Clinton not to deregulate telecommunications. One of the many things we needed him not to deregulate.
- daodedickinson 10y agoWe needed Teddy Roosevelt trust busting like that 7 years ago, preferably from someone without a lot of money in competitors of Time Warner (although Teddy wasn't the poorest chap).