Reading around the other posts by that "translator", they sound like a wonderful person with a perfectly balanced attitude towards people of color, immigrants,

Reading around the other posts by that "translator", they sound like a wonderful person with a perfectly balanced attitude towards people of color, immigrants, women, etc. (Illustrative excerpt: "Complex dialectic is best saved for fellow red-pilled folks because someone who is new to our thinking will forget the wonkier points later. Short, quippy summations are more effective with newbs because they are memorable and they define the big picture. Example: A questioning friend: 'Why is it bad to let women vote?' You: 'Because men vote for liberty and women vote for tyranny.' Friend: 'How so?' You: 'Women instinctively submit to power. So whichever party appears to be dominant, especially if its rule is heavy-handed and its figurehead is charismatic, women will support that party. Men are less risk-averse, we chafe under overbearing authority, and we take a longer view of things.' Another example: Friend: 'So why are our governments doing this to us? What’s their motive?' You: 'White men hang tyrants. Muds stab each other over sneakers.'" This particular excerpt from https://paworldandtimes.wordpress.com/2016/09/25/we-would-recognize-each-other/ https://paworldandtimes.wordpress.com/2016/09/25/we-would-re..., but every post is like that)