3 ms·
It shouldn't be legal to tell someone who owns a home that they cannot rent it out Your right to do as you please with your property ends where my property, an
by ubernostrum 10y ago
It shouldn't be legal to tell someone who owns a home that they cannot rent it out
Your right to do as you please with your property ends where my property, and interference with my enjoyment of it, begins.
Or do you also think that if you buy some property straddling a river, you can dump waste into it and say "my property, nobody can tell me what to do with it" while making everyone downriver pay for the cleanup of what you did? Because that's the ultimate moral grounding of laws restricting property -- you don't own an isolated island in the middle of nowhere, you own property that's adjacent to and can affect other pieces of property owned by other people who also have rights.
- braveo 10y ago> Or do you also think that if you buy some property straddling a river, you can dump waste into it and say "my property, nobody can tell me what to do with it" while making everyone downriver pay for the cleanup of what you did? You can't actually own the land around a river, but I get the point you're trying to make regardless. The point is, if they're causing a ruckus, report them and have it shut down. If they're not, leave it alone. And having multiple different vehicles in the driveway isn't causing a ruckus. This is basically FUD. What if they do something the neighbors don't like!?! Then deal with it at that time, stop being thought police.