4 ms·
Overall it looks good. When I look at this : "Production use measures our design success; it's the ultimate reality check. Rust takes a unique stance on a num
by geodel 10y ago
Overall it looks good.
When I look at this :
"Production use measures our design success; it's the ultimate reality check. Rust takes a unique stance on a number of tradeoffs, which we believe to position it well for writing fast and reliable software. The real test of those beliefs is people using Rust to build large, production systems, on which they're betting time and money."
I see a little bit of haste towards production use. From 'Rust 1.0 is out just last year' to 'We really need successful production use', It does some to be a push from management to justify continued investment in Rust project.
- brson 10y agoWe want rust to be successful and that means being adopted and used. It has nothing to do with management and justifying investing in rust. We are fortunate that Mozilla invests in rust to use rust and is currently very happy doing so.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- aturon 10y agoThe intent wasn't to say that we should be seeing big production use right this second, but rather to set out an overall "north star" for work on Rust. The investments in Rust today should be made with an eye toward driving or enabling production use in the future. I've updated the RFC to clarify this; thanks for the comment!