4 ms·
WL's Twitter has claimed it was WL supporters. Although no one can really confirm what's going on with them since the Ecuadorian embassy events the other day.
by orthoganol 10y ago
WL's Twitter has claimed it was WL supporters. Although no one can really confirm what's going on with them since the Ecuadorian embassy events the other day.
- rconti 10y agoI have no idea what that stands for. I've exhausted a Google search and 30 seconds of memory probing for recent events/people/places/governments that match "WL".
- sehr 10y agowikileaks
- cdvonstinkpot 10y agoWikiLeaks I think
- Renaud 10y agoMaybe WikiLeaks?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- phereford 10y agoI _think_ WL == WikiLeaks.
- rconti 10y agoThanks everyone. I don't know how I wasn't able to come up with it given the reference to the Ecuadoran embassy.
- breakfastpizza 10y agoWikiLeaks
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- orthoganol 10y agoIs this really deserving of the downvotes? I just quoted what they tweeted regarding the outage. It seems outlandish, but it is what they stated.