I think this is poor use of terminology. No one with any experience can deny that there are self important programmers with a highly twisted sense of reality th

I think this is poor use of terminology. No one with any experience can deny that there are self important programmers with a highly twisted sense of reality that can effectively destroy a project or product. Or that engineering should be appropriately balanced against business desires. But'Over-Engineering' conjures images of drinking cups made to withstand the force of a tank rolling over them. Or platinum fasteners, or spending 20 months doing usability studies as the market slides past. The failure modes that this article describes are just bad engineering. Or broadly, bad organizations that tolerate or can't differentiate bad engineering.