5 ms·
> I've been singing the praise of AWS Route53 for a long time, they up and running. I'm a fan of Route53, too. But can we say that it weathered the attack? O
by crftr 10y ago
> I've been singing the praise of AWS Route53 for a long time, they up and running.
I'm a fan of Route53, too.
But can we say that it weathered the attack? Or was it just lucky that its systems weren't targeted?
- cloudjacker 10y ago> Or was it just lucky that its systems weren't targeted? I was wondering that too
- stevekemp 10y agoOne of the reasons why Route53 is good is because they give different nameservers to each hosted zone - unless you choose to use a branded record-set. I've seen them be hit by dDos attacks in the past, but never had any significant impact. (I wrap Route53 and handle storing DNS records in a git repository over at https://dns-api.com/ https://dns-api.com/ Adding support for other backends is my current priority to allow more redundancy.)