4 ms·
FP can still have types, like haskell. Typing is independent of OOP vs FP
by mahyarm 10y ago
FP can still have types, like haskell. Typing is independent of OOP vs FP
- Roboprog 10y agoSorry. Generally, when I hear people complain about the lack of "types" in a dynamic language, I'm pretty sure what they mean is [static] "classes", so that "intellisense" (auto-complete, for non-MS/VS-bubble-land) works. Then next, a hair-brained XML configuration scheme (with reflection) will be used to work around the inevitable deficiencies, which an IDE plug-in may or may not parse accurately. Tragedy ensues. (Or hilarity, if I get to stand back while somebody else has to support the monster) YMMV.