4 ms·
In this case the article clearly says the uploader can submit a counter-notice to reinstate the video, so it sounds exactly like a standard DMCA notice to me.
by parent5446 10y ago
In this case the article clearly says the uploader can submit a counter-notice to reinstate the video, so it sounds exactly like a standard DMCA notice to me.
- jimktrains2 10y agoJust because it sounds like it doesn't mean it is. http://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2013/12/19/the-injustice-of-the-youtube-content-id-crackdown-reveals-googles-dark-side http://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2013/12/19/the-injust...
- parent5446 10y agoNot sure how that article is relevant. As I just said, you can submit a counter-notice. Sure the ContentID system might have flaws, but (as the article says) you can still dispute it.
- jimktrains2 10y agoYou said "so it sounds exactly like a standard DMCA notice to me." My point was that ContentID isn't the DMCA, or even a legal notice. It exists only within YouTube.
- parent5446 10y agoIf it was only ContentID and not DMCA-related at all, then there would be no counter-notice.
- jimktrains2 10y agoWhy couldn't contentid have it's own counter notice? Your arguing from your assumption, not to.
- parent5446 10y agoBecause I've received Content ID notices before. The wording is very different. First you "dispute" the Content ID notice, and then the appeal is rejected, and it gives you a separate form to send a "counter-notice", which contains explicit warnings that the copyright holder can then sue you after you send the notice. Sure it's an assumption, but based on the reading of this article, it seems very clear that this was the result of a DMCA notice.