4 ms·
Fun, but I'd find this information more useful if juxtaposed with an analysis of the livability and practicality of the various McMansion species. After all,
by zuminator 10y ago
Fun, but I'd find this information more useful if juxtaposed with an analysis of the livability and practicality of the various McMansion species. After all, a person spends a lot more time inhabiting the home as opposed to looking at it, so ultimately the inside is a lot more important than the outside. As a few people already noted, attached garages may be generally ugly but they're useful. Can one say the same about multistorey windows and entryways, lots of dormers, large columns, random multiple window styles, etc.? Do these things add aesthetic or practical value to the house for the people actually residing in them? Or are they mere eyecandy for tasteless consumers but in the end add nothing to the enjoyment of daily living.
- usrusr 10y agoIndividual house dissection do go into detail about how the outside is reflected on the inside, to bad effects. See this one for example: http://www.mcmansionhell.com/post/149128564511/mclean-virginia http://www.mcmansionhell.com/post/149128564511/mclean-virgin... It's even more chaotic on the inside than on the outside. The Homer Simpson car without wheels.
- Jean-Philipe 10y agoShe actually spends at least half of her compliments on the inside of those houses. Reading the blog before commenting might be a good idea.