2 ms·
The accumulated evidence isn't significant, then? There's certainly a risk of some running off with very little evidence, but the trail in this case seems very
by pwinnski 10y ago
The accumulated evidence isn't significant, then?
There's certainly a risk of some running off with very little evidence, but the trail in this case seems very clear without any election hysteria involved.
- gozur88 10y agoThey have a detailed storyline, it's true. There's not a lot of actual evidence, though. The story relies a lot on "US intelligence officials believe..." That's a big appeal for trust in people I don't trust. And I don't see how you can separate it from "election hysteria", since the Clinton people are pushing the narrative for that reason.