2 ms·
Methinks you had a double-negative too many. Your sentence says it's impossible to prove the existence of something. Unless that's what you had intended, in whi
by hueving 10y ago
Methinks you had a double-negative too many. Your sentence says it's impossible to prove the existence of something. Unless that's what you had intended, in which case I don't see how that's useful philosophy for this discussion.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- AndrewKemendo 10y agoYou're correct, I mis-typed and it should have been proven the non-existence.