> The NSA really needs a "security section" that actively monitors the usage of resources of its employees And then what? What happens when somebody in the se

> The NSA really needs a "security section" that actively monitors the usage of resources of its employees And then what? What happens when somebody in the security section decides to do something nefarious? A security section for the security section? An infinite regress of watchers watching watchers? At the bottom of it all, you have to trust _someone_ eventually. And nobody yet has figured out how to guarantee that a person is or remains trustworthy.