The next generation already has a sense that the concept of "ownership" is colonialistic and often unethical. Does Nestle have a right to the world's water? Doe

The next generation already has a sense that the concept of "ownership" is colonialistic and often unethical. Does Nestle have a right to the world's water? Does IKEA Shellmound have the rights to an ancient native American spiritual site? Does Tesla have a right to the world's battery supply? Does Trump have a right to New York real estate? Does Putin have a right to Crimea? Does Kim Jong In have a right to North Korea? Obviously the answers to these questions vary, but few people will answer "Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, always, if you could get a deed to the Earth you could feed us all to the dogs". And the new generations believe in the sacred rights of the capital class less and less.