6 ms·
Why not make a strawman argument? I'm not advocating that we set up intentional barriers, like the poll taxes of old. What I said was that if a side effect of
by CWuestefeld 10y ago
Why not make a strawman argument?
I'm not advocating that we set up intentional barriers, like the poll taxes of old. What I said was that if a side effect of a legitimate effort has a side effect, it's not a bad thing. I was taking that from the idea that uninformed voters aren't helping the process; Mike Rowe explains that better than I can [1].
This is deliberate disenfranchisement.
No. There may be other folks who do want to gag people and would use this as a pretense. You shouldn't simply assume that I am one of those people. You're putting words in my mouth, and trying to say that I'm lying about what my motives are. If that's how you're going to approach debate, then I don't think it's worth wasting bits on you.
[1] http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/08/19/mike-rowe-delivers-some-undeniable-reality-about-celebrities-who-urge-the-masses-to-get-out-and-vote/ http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/08/19/mike-rowe-deliver...