3 ms·
my Nest Cam People buying literal spyware to spy on themselves is definitely part of the problem. http://www.computerworld.com/article/2476599/cybercrime-hack
by paavokoya 10y ago
my Nest Cam
People buying literal spyware to spy on themselves is definitely part of the problem.
http://www.computerworld.com/article/2476599/cybercrime-hacking/black-hat-nest-thermostat-turned-into-a-smart-spy-in-15-seconds.html http://www.computerworld.com/article/2476599/cybercrime-hack...
EDIT: I knew this would get downvotes from a crowd that simultaneously abhors surveillance yet trumpets spyware like Nest as innovative. Cognitive dissonance is strong here.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- npsimons 10y ago> I knew this would get downvotes from a crowd that simultaneously abhors surveillance yet trumpets spyware like Nest as innovative. Cognitive dissonance is strong here. Shouldn't be a big surprise from the same crowd that thinks "gut bacteria" trumps CICO, never mind that gut biome being different in overweight/obese versus healthy weight is probably more an effect than a cause.
- paavokoya 10y agoThat's a whole nother topic. CICO isn't as important as where you get those calories from. If a majority are from sugar, you are getting way too much insulin which then creates fat in the body. If you get fibrous and fatty calories, it takes more energy to break them down and store them thus leading to healthier fat/muscle.
- strictnein 10y agoNothing to do with cognitive dissonance. Some of us just aren't impressed by "hacks" that require the "hacker" to gain physical access to your home and the hardware. > "Once an attacker has physical access" Also, strangely the article isn't about the the Nest Cam, so it's really just the billionth in a series of articles that reinforce that if an attacker has physical access you're screwed.
- paavokoya 10y agoDoes Nest ping to any companies servers?