3 ms·
From an editorial perspective that digression wouldn't have added a whole lot to the point of the page. What would you be hoping to communicate?
by oldmanjay 10y ago
From an editorial perspective that digression wouldn't have added a whole lot to the point of the page. What would you be hoping to communicate?
- jackmott 10y agoIt might be slightly good to at least mention that AMD and Intel both worked on this at about the same time. I may make this edit next time I push an update for something else. I welcome pedantic critiques because, well..I too am pedantic. :D
- masklinn 10y agoAlternatively, remove that mention and just note that over the last 10 years pretty much all computers have become multi-core, even expanding to multi-core phones?
- masklinn 10y ago> From an editorial perspective that digression wouldn't have added a whole lot to the point of the page. Then remove it altogether and only talk in generalities? The rest of the paragraph doesn't namedrop specific brands.
- oldmanjay 10y agoI'm sorry, somehow I thought there was something interesting behind this beyond mere brand loyalty/antipathy. I see now I was mistaken.
- masklinn 10y agoEr… what? You're the one who objected on editorial grounds that a digression into the more interesting facets of the issue would detail from the core of the article. I'm providing an easy fix of not raising the issue by not putting in objectionable details in the first place, that has nothing to do with "brand loyalty/antipathy".