You know, saying he had information meaning we had to go to war when in fact, he didn't. Imagine someone rilling everyone up about a pedophile who kidnapped th

You know, saying he had information meaning we had to go to war when in fact, he didn't. Imagine someone rilling everyone up about a pedophile who kidnapped their child and then, when everyone has kicked the kidnapper's door in and shot him, they reveal that it was actually just a rumor? Why should we draw some hard line between sides of his life? I never hear prosecutors say "Well, he robbed a bank, but only as part of his day-job. When he retires he'll be guiltless."