4 ms·
Do you actually know something or is it just speculation? It looks like they are attempting to prohibit driving people for money, not connecting the car to una
by qb45 10y ago
Do you actually know something or is it just speculation?
It looks like they are attempting to prohibit driving people for money, not connecting the car to unauthorized software. "Revenue purposes" is the exact words they used.
- snrplfth 10y agoIt is what they appear to be referring to, given the fact that they are saying "using a self-driving Tesla...for revenue purposes will only be permissible on the Tesla Network". So you can drive people for money, or you can let it self-drive on the Tesla Network, but it can't connect to other, non-Tesla-Network software. Now, it could, maybe, also mean that a self-driving Tesla would be prohibited from being leased out for a night without using software to mediate the transaction. But I think this pretty clearly refers to hooking up a self-driving Tesla to an Uber or Lyft style app. Edit: and they've certainly seen the trouble that Uber and Lyft have gotten into insurance-wise with regards to carrying passengers as a "public accomodation". It's quite possible that they want to handle this centrally for insurance purposes. Which are bound to be a challenge with regards to self-driving cars.