3 ms·

Did you read the piece? Because it sounds like you didn't. It doesn't malign the source.

• jsprogrammer 10y ago
  Did you read my comment? It wasn't about the piece, but the comment I responded to.
  • sigmar 10y ago
    The entirety of his comment was summarizing the piece (To quote it: this is a..., The piece does not say...., It doubly says that if we..., This piece is a defense of...). and he didn't add any maligning.
    • jsprogrammer 10y ago
      I was referring to this: >The danger here is that were the government to effectively coop wikileaks itself, which you think is anti-government, it would become a brutal and effective trojan horse. The malignment is that "the government" would somehow use wikileaks to some negative ends [sneak into our minds?!]. >The entirety of his comment You'll note that the original article doesn't even contain the word "trojan", and only mentions Wikileaks twice -- never in the context of it being co-opt'd by a government.