3 ms·
"...where none existed before." For you maybe, but part of the reason they're removing it is because many average users had no idea what it was for.
by Qz 17y ago
"...where none existed before."
For you maybe, but part of the reason they're removing it is because many average users had no idea what it was for.
- TotlolRon 17y agoThe functional confusion stems from the modification of basic copy/paste, not from the removal of data from the address bar.
- Qz 17y agoOh -- still, that doesn't seem like something that can't be fixed with minor tweaking.
- ay 17y agocode.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=41609 is an example where there's a hard problem that materializes out of thin air as a result.
- Qz 17y agoRead the thread... doesn't seem like a 'hard' problem, rather, it just seems like there are multiple ways to handle the issue and they haven't decided on which one yet.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- TotlolRon 17y agoWYSIWYG copy/paste is binary. It either is, or not. You can't tweak binary. WYSIWYG copy/paste is bound to break at some point. But it should be pushed as far as possible to complex tasks not floated into the most abstract action - copying an address. The issue is conceptual, it is unrelated to implementation.