3 ms·
And slave owners are the ones who allowed slaves to eat. That's not an argument that slaves should not fight for their freedom. Your income is physically earne
by Retra 10y ago
And slave owners are the ones who allowed slaves to eat. That's not an argument that slaves should not fight for their freedom.
Your income is physically earned, not 'allowed' to you by insidious and underhanded legal means.
- toomuchtodo 10y agoComparing a EULA or software ownership to slavery is such an excellent example of technologists being out of touch with the rest of humanity.
- Smaug123 10y agoPresumably you're aware that comparing one thing to another does not imply that the GP thinks they are anywhere near equivalent. The common meaning of the word "comparable" is not "can be compared", but "roughly equivalent". You are acting as though GP considers them comparable-in-the-second-sense; GP's post actually claims them to be comparable-in-the-first-sense.