3 ms·
I find it mindboggling that instead of removing the silly and superfluous "www." they are trying to remove the meaningful and important "http:// http://. It do
by jwr 17y ago
I find it mindboggling that instead of removing the silly and superfluous "www." they are trying to remove the meaningful and important "http:// http://.
It doesn't solve any actual problem and creates a slew of new ones.
- tzs 17y ago"www" is only superfluous at some sites, and there is no way they can tell which. Even doing a name lookup on both and checking if the IP is the same is not sufficient, because they could be different virtual hosts on the same IP.