3 ms·

I think you mean that the Supreme Court has found that Voter ID laws, properly enforced, do not impose an excessive burden [0]. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wi

• evgen 10y ago
  No, I mean that numerous examples over the past few years have shown that partisans of a single political party have been using the loophole provided by that case to try to pass laws which are trivially shown to be aimed at disenfranchising people. Luckily, we have lots of good examples now of cases working their way up the appeals process and once they get cert before a new court the Crawford decision will likely be overturned.