4 ms·
I don't think thats actually true. Designers are mostly very good at not adding too much because it goes against their aesthetic mission. What you are talking
by ThomPete 10y ago
I don't think thats actually true. Designers are mostly very good at not adding too much because it goes against their aesthetic mission.
What you are talking about is product people or product owners not designers.
- mianos 10y agoDo you think it's the product people asking for grey fonts on a light grey background? (What the article is saying).
- flukus 10y ago> Designers are mostly very good at not adding too much because it goes against their aesthetic mission. That's what's fashionable today (or yesterday? I can't keep up), but it hasn't always been the case.
- ThomPete 10y agoCan you elaborate? When wasn't it been the case? For the last 20 years I have been doing this it was the case. Before that too. So not sure what you are referring to.
- flukus 10y ago~10 years ago UX was all about adding animations, glow effects and colors as hints to the user. Colors are still used (but much more sparingly) and animations and glow effect have fallen out of fashion.
- ThomPete 10y agoNot sure what you are talking about. You sure you are not confusing campaign sites with actual digital tools and resources? It's never been a trend by designers to want to overcomplicate the design. The strive for whitespace runs so deep in most designers that you simple don't get the used car salesman mentality where every little pixel left untouched is one to much.
- flukus 10y agoNot confusing it with campaign sites, I'm talking business/productivity apps. It's entirely possible my experience was atypical, the I did a lot of reading about UX at the time and this seems to be what the "best practice" was at the time. So if a dialog was shown the best way to do it was to have the dialog expand from the clicked element for instance. Now dialog's are frowned upon.