6 ms·
Would you let your child roam about Chicago these days?
by monkmartinez 10y ago
Would you let your child roam about Chicago these days?
- teen 10y agoI think most of the major cities were actually worse when we were children
- monkmartinez 10y agoSeriously? I don't have the words... especially for Chicago. http://heyjackass.com/ http://heyjackass.com/ <- This is a serious website BTW
- tirant 10y agoWell, there's been clearly a decline: http://heyjackass.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/yearly_homicide_trend.png http://heyjackass.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/yearly_homi...
- pilom 10y agoYour own link shows that Chicago had almost twice as many shootings in the 1970's and early 1990's than it has today. Sounds safer to me.
- monkmartinez 10y agoLook at 1989 to 2011 homicides... most by far. Also, 608 killings so far this year... Trend for homicides is SKYROCKETING.
- vonmoltke 10y agoAre you talking about the table under "Yearly Murder Trend"? Of course the 1989 entry is the highest; it's the longest period. The only other period on that table of comparable length is 1955 - 1976, with about 3700 less homicides but also a much smaller city. The line chart above the table clearly backs up the statement you were replying to. From 1968 through 2001 Chicago never had a year with less than 600 homicides. Yes, this year has seen a sharp uptick for some reason. It is still the first time in 15 years Chicago has broken that 600 threshold. This year notwithstanding Chicago has been significantly safer this millennium than it was when most of the people on this site were kids.
- bonesmoses 10y agoThis is in very specific neighborhoods due to gang activity for the most part. It's hardly an indicator of safety over the city in general.
- vkou 10y agoAlmost every year between 1970 and 1996 had more homicides then are there have been + that there are projected to be in 2016.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- teen 10y agoI think the the world is becoming much safer, while at the same time, seems a lot scarier because social media has given massive exposure to any sort of danger / problems in society. Things that shock us now were the norm 30 years ago, and the really awful stuff (racial homicides, police corruption) is becoming more rare.
- dlp211 10y agoYou don't have to think the world is becoming safer, it absolutely is. And not just safer, but more prosperous and wealth is more distributed then ever. Here is just a single article going over many of these things: http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/12/good-news-in-2015/421200/ http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/12/goo...
- yomly 10y agoPersonally, I don't find such topline metrics that helpful. If India improves by some margin (noting that it is a country with relatively more space to grow than a developed nation) then the averages for the whole World would improve, given that India represents 1/6th the global population. This would mask any relative declines in pockets/cities in a country like the US. NB I only very quickly skimmed the article, and base this opinion on the usage of broad terminology like "the World is...". It may be objectively true but is not really pertinent to the discussion of whether Chicago is or is not getting safer...
- nkrisc 10y agoLook at the distribution of homicides in the city. Some neighborhoods haven't had a single homicide for many years.
- initram 10y agoHaving lived there and assuming they had an upbringing similar to the OP, then yes, I would. Like any city, there are parts that are safer than others. As long as I felt my children could understand the difference and were informed enough not to do anything too stupid, I'd be comfortable with them roaming around the city on their own for some things.
- brianwawok 10y agoI would. 75% of Chicago is very safe. Stay out of the bad areas and it is fine.
- mayukh 10y agoHow old are your kids?
- brianwawok 10y ago2 and 11. Obviously not the 2 yet.
- selectodude 10y agoI roamed free in Chicago (city) once I was 10. Still in Chicago. Never been shot. Neither have any of my friends. One is dead of a heroin overdose though...
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- irrational 10y agoYes. I did when I was middle school aged. I loved the science museum, but I also wandered around other places downtown. Other than some security guards harassing me when I tried to use the bathroom in their lobby and some homeless people asking me for stuff I don't recall any incidents. And from what I understand seems are safer now then they were in the mid-80s when I was wandering Chicago.
- sotojuan 10y agoIronically, the more urban, working class, and "rough" an area is, the more kids you see outside playing by themselves or being home alone without their parents.
- mi100hael 10y agoMaybe not the best argument in favor of continuing the practice since those areas also tend to have higher levels of gang membership and drug use.
- girvo 10y agoWhich stem from poverty.
- monkmartinez 10y agoWhich begets the vicious cycle...
- tallanvor 10y agoYes, without a doubt. The violence in Chicago is confined to a couple of small areas and are a result of racist policies that will unfortunately take years to fix. Most of the city is as safe as the average town in America.
- nkrisc 10y agoYes, probably. Most of Chicago is very safe. My neighborhood ranks as one of the safest in the city. Kids are very likely in my very near future so I'll find out soon enough.