3 ms·
That's the reporters writing. The whole point of these people is that they couldn't give a toss about what womankind does or does not owe them. They've chosen
by UK-AL 10y ago
That's the reporters writing.
The whole point of these people is that they couldn't give a toss about what womankind does or does not owe them.
They've chosen not to play the game.
- eropple 10y agoIf this were true, there would be a lot fewer electrons perturbed by the depth and breath of the efforts that this "movement"'s purveyors go to to convince everybody that, no, no, they're fine, they're really fine. They totally don't care, even though they can't stop writing about how much they don't care. (And then you actually read what they write, and it becomes obvious that it's MRA-style misogyny buried beneath a veneer of "those grapes were sour anyway.")
- x0x0 10y agoI don't think that's true at all; I think for many this is an extended whinge that they aren't getting what they think they deserve. viz the (wildly misogynistic) picture of the "international symbol for marriage" which shows a man giving a woman cash. Personally, I don't care much about the structure of other peoples' relationships: who earns more, who contributes more in other ways, etc. But the thing is, you pick your partner. So if these guys think women are just after their cash, maybe they should pick different partners. But my strong guess is they generally have low incomes, low physical attractiveness, poor social skills, and poor personalities; think they deserve really attractive women who make a ton of money and love doing housework; and are pissed that these women aren't showing up.