3 ms·
> "Not only that, but the US has already said Russia is behind those attacks; it would actually harm their argument if they built a giant PR campaign" Did not
by usaphp 10y ago
> "Not only that, but the US has already said Russia is behind those attacks; it would actually harm their argument if they built a giant PR campaign"
Did not US said that Iraq had a weapon of mass destruction and invaded them with a huge PR campaign?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- tptacek 10y agoIt was not my claim that the US doesn't run PR campaigns, just that the one you propose doesn't make sense.
- usaphp 10y agoYou whole argument is based on what US said and that they would not lie because it would ruin their PR campaign. US can say whatever they want so do Russia, but so far none of them showed any proof that hackers were sponsored by Russian gov.
- tptacek 10y agoThat claim is also factually inaccurate.
- PerfectDlite 10y agoAnd Iraq actually had weapons of mass desctruction.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- poshli 10y agowell if you're going to go there... there's a great Bill Hicks sketch about how we knew the Iraqis had WMDs, we had the receipts!