I read until the point I found a lapse in reasoning, in this case that the fact that Obama advertised in video games was related in some fashion to whether or n

I read until the point I found a lapse in reasoning, in this case that the fact that Obama advertised in video games was related in some fashion to whether or not video game playing teenagers would make better citizens. I then scanned briefly for references to Huizinga. You might be right that not all of the essay is fallacious simply because some component part is, but this seemed esp. egregious.