Fair point. I still think she should publicize their names, but the NYTimes shouldn't include them. Even if you're responding to my parenthetical first sentenc

Fair point. I still think she should publicize their names, but the NYTimes shouldn't include them. Even if you're responding to my parenthetical first sentence, I don't see how that has anything to do with 'anti-anti-sexism'. I was just articulating the concern anybody should have for seeming like a troublemaker. There's a fine distinction between being outspoken and a troublemaker. The latter is just looking for a reason to seem outspoken - a distracting influence at a startup.