3 ms·
Approval voting is my favorite, too - for single-winner elections. But no single-winner voting system beats proportional representation systems [1] when it come
by mtgx 10y ago
Approval voting is my favorite, too - for single-winner elections. But no single-winner voting system beats proportional representation systems [1] when it comes to electing Congress members, legislatures, councils, etc.
Everyone gets much better representation when "their candidate" can actually get a seat at the table, instead of having one party/candidate "take it all" (in that local region of theirs). It also spurs collaboration [2] and "bridge-building" rather than division and obstruction as it happens with the FPTP in the U.S. (and elsewhere)
My biggest hope is that Canada is closing-in on a proportional representation voting system, and adopts it within the next year. That could (or should) make it an election issue for 2018 and 2020 in the U.S., too.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWPx8hmd4pQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWPx8hmd4pQ
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vS62N5b5L7Y https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vS62N5b5L7Y
- gotofritz 10y agoThis is ok if the only goal is to give a voice to all voters. But proportional representation produces all too often unworkable majorities and grand coalitions. Just look at Italy's postwar history for why pure PR is not to be recommended.