3 ms·
First hit TheHill - the opposite of my trust pool - seems to agree with what I said. Not "Trump lied to the FBI and is funded by the same people who fund ISIS"
by SixSigma 10y ago
First hit TheHill - the opposite of my trust pool - seems to agree with what I said. Not "Trump lied to the FBI and is funded by the same people who fund ISIS".
- Tomte 10y agoYou didn't claim "Trump lied to the FBI and is funded by the same people who fund ISIS" You claimed "he had nothing on Trump". And the links clearly counter that. That's my last reply to you. I don't like my discussion partners to sleazily try and retroactively change their claims to something nobody ever talked about when shown counter arguments. That's not an honest mistake, that's simply dishonest and a waste of time.
- SixSigma 10y agoI think "says stupid things" and "undermines the democratic process by using slush funds, illegal foreign donations and a slew of felonious crimes" is hardly a moral equivalent. So I double down on my assertion: Wikileaks has nothing on Trump.
- ZoF 10y agoHaha, remember SixSigma, you're the sleazy dishonest one here! Shame! Shame! Shame!