Pretty much the only points which make sense are threats of violence and impersonation. Maybe invasion of privacy. Exploits and NSFW is just silly and the rest

Pretty much the only points which make sense are threats of violence and impersonation. Maybe invasion of privacy. Exploits and NSFW is just silly and the rest is asking for abuse. > I'm sure agreement is much higher for their rejection of "Active malware or exploits". Not really, especially when they use it as an excuse to censor lists of malware-infested websites https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12712648 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12712648 while providing hosting for years to famous projects like https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework Not that I think they should take MS down, of course.