4 ms·
> But we were not _really_ behind. We should keep telling ourselves that. It may also help us convince ourselves that our arsehole is indeed the best place for
by ChoHag 10y ago
> But we were not _really_ behind.
We should keep telling ourselves that. It may also help us convince ourselves that our arsehole is indeed the best place for our head to be.
- throwaway123098 10y agoAlso, Explorer 1 had scientific payload (which discovered the Van-Allen belts), unlike Sputnik
- ChoHag 10y agoYou keep that masturbation going! You'll convince yourself everything's OK by the end.
- madaxe_again 10y agoSputnik was the science payload - at that point the US were still saying it'd be years until orbit was reached. Ironically, had it not been for the space race, we might have a more mature space program now, rather than one largely based on 1940s technology and engineering. They rushed to production and massively invested in a single model on both sides, rather than exploring options fully before commencing - similar applies to nuclear technology, insofar as thorium would have been the better tech, but was too late to the party to gain traction, never mind the weapon byproduct bit.