The article's title: "We're on Slack! Join us!" The submission's original title: "Creative Commons migrates away from open communication protocols" Per HN's g

The article's title: "We're on Slack! Join us!" The submission's original title: "Creative Commons migrates away from open communication protocols" Per HN's guidelines [1], "please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait." This is editorializing on part of the submitter; and further, I disagree with the implied substance of the submitter's argument. I think it's nice that they're on Slack now, because it's a platform that's popular with developers right now. They explain why they think Slack is a great choice (accessibility, familiarity, popularity, variety of supported platforms), and as others have pointed out, they are also on IRC and have bridged their IRC to Slack... so this is a best-of-both-world scenario.