5 ms·
I can't agree. First off, they say they stand for transparency. That's often synonymous with impartiality but not always. Second, one of the candidates in this
by mtnygard 10y ago
I can't agree. First off, they say they stand for transparency. That's often synonymous with impartiality but not always.
Second, one of the candidates in this election has previously stated that Assange should be killed.
To me that moves the motivation from founder's grudge to self-defense.
- 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago> one of the candidates in this election has previously stated that Assange should be killed Is it really biased to expose lies and wrongdoings of a person who called for you to be executed without trial?
- gotofritz 10y agoIt is if the claim is bullshit
- belltaco 10y ago>Second, one of the candidates in this election has previously stated that Assange should be killed. Claim does not hold up. http://www.snopes.com/julian-assange-drone-strike/ http://www.snopes.com/julian-assange-drone-strike/