3 ms·

We were discussing whether or not it's a "feature" that you don't have to cook and the rationale for that thinking is simply that some people don't want to cook

by 59nadir 10y ago

We were discussing whether or not it's a "feature" that you don't have to cook and the rationale for that thinking is simply that some people don't want to cook. Whatever you replace the act of cooking with in that example is entirely up to you. But it's undeniably a feature to some people and were I not married I would very likely replace a few meals with something like this, if it was available to me where I live. I find it interesting that there are so many of you that take offense to what other people choose to do with their own time and energy, as well as what they eat. Have you noticed a lot of people dislike people who try to force their lifestyles and/or dietary choices on other people? Do you see any similarities between those people and your own comments, perhaps?

M_Grey 10y ago
Reading in offense to what I've said? It's not there. If anything, I'd say that my original comment caused offense, which I'm now having to manage. Typical, boring, but then, I did walk into this. i can't imagine wanting to waste time on food, i've felt this way for as long as I can remember I'm not talking about, or to people who use Soylent instead of a granola bar.
- 59nadir 10y ago
  > Reading in offense to what I've said? It's not there. I would hope that the reason you compared not wanting to cook with, again, a socially crippling disorder was that you were somehow offended by the idea of other people having different priorities than you. I can understand someone having an emotional outburst because they're offended by other people not being like them, along with a lapse in judgment and ending up writing that comment, but I can't understand how someone would get there from a rational point of view. I assumed, charitably, that you were somehow offended.
  - M_Grey 10y ago
    "Not wanting to cook..." And again, how much clearer can I be in that I'm not talking about that? You're welcome to ignore that fact, and go on these intensely boring rhetorical diversions, but it achieves nothing.

by 59nadir 10y ago

M_Grey 10y ago

Reading in offense to what I've said? It's not there. If anything, I'd say that my original comment caused offense, which I'm now having to manage. Typical, boring, but then, I did walk into this. i can't imagine wanting to waste time on food, i've felt this way for as long as I can remember I'm not talking about, or to people who use Soylent instead of a granola bar.

59nadir 10y ago
> Reading in offense to what I've said? It's not there. I would hope that the reason you compared not wanting to cook with, again, a socially crippling disorder was that you were somehow offended by the idea of other people having different priorities than you. I can understand someone having an emotional outburst because they're offended by other people not being like them, along with a lapse in judgment and ending up writing that comment, but I can't understand how someone would get there from a rational point of view. I assumed, charitably, that you were somehow offended.
- M_Grey 10y ago
  "Not wanting to cook..." And again, how much clearer can I be in that I'm not talking about that? You're welcome to ignore that fact, and go on these intensely boring rhetorical diversions, but it achieves nothing.