> when compared to twinkies and sugary sodas it might still be better for you Might? Like you hinted, this all seems like a valid argument to be made against

> when compared to twinkies and sugary sodas it might still be better for you Might? Like you hinted, this all seems like a valid argument to be made against any given modern diet. I can't imagine that even the most careful and educated person alive is eating meals that resemble what our ancestors had experience with for thousands of years. So we can't necessarily rely on that, and we're waiting on feedback from fields you claim are in their infancy. It could be that a long-term soylent diet turns out to make you infertile, or that it repairs your body 1.5 times faster. I bet that the truth is probably somewhere closer to neutral, and I don't think that's as crazy a risk as you're making it out to be.