4 ms·

Yet you are taking Clinton's conspiracy theories at face value?

• bduerst 10y ago
  No, I'm taking the FBI's suspicion at face value, because they're in charge of protecting the U.S. from foreign intelligence threats. And I'm also taking CrowdStrike, Fidelis Cybersecurity, Mandiant, SecureWorks, ThreatConnect, and the editor for Ars Technica at face value as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0 This prevalence of your reactionary conspiracy witch-hunt is precisely what this thread is about.
  • TheGirondin 10y ago
    Please link to where the FBI said the Russians are conspiring to rig the election for Trump.
    • bduerst 10y ago
      The FBI said the Podesta Email hack was related to Russia: http://bfy.tw/8Fq5 http://bfy.tw/8Fq5
      • TheGirondin 10y ago
        Just to confirm though, nothing about the Russians conspiring to rig the election for Trump.
        • bduerst 10y ago
          >Russians conspiring to rig the election for Trump. Well, that's your straw man. The evidence shows that Russian intelligence is meddling in the 2016 U.S. Election, and it's focused solely on attacking Trump's competition. There's no publicly available evidence that shows collusion between Trump's campaign and Russia, other than Trump publicly calling for the Russians to hack Hillary's email accounts.
          • TheGirondin 10y ago
            No, that's what Clinton has repeatedly said throughout the debates.
            • deleted 10y ago
              [deleted]
            • bduerst 10y ago
              Well, she probably has a different burden of proof for conspiracy than you do, but I'm still not sure what that has to do with my statement about what the FBI is doing with the Russian hacker(s) Guccifer 2.0